No menu items!

Year-end bonus for domestic workers: the Government will reimburse 50% of the salary and specifies the requirements

Share This Post

- Advertisement -

Two weeks after knowing the scope of the year-end bonus provided by the Government for the private sector, the Ministry of Labor announced this Friday the reimbursement of the 50% for those who paid it to domestic workers.

- Advertisement -

To have this advantage, employers they do not have to pay income tax.

Furthermore, in detailing the conditions that those who want to qualify to apply for reinstatement must meet, the employment portfolio specifies that employers should not have “at the same time as a subordinate job and an economic activity classified under the simplified regime for small taxpayers in the category ‘c’ or higher or under self-employment regime”, or be “in the Registry of sanctioned employers”.

- Advertisement -

Also note that the goods declared according to the personal property tax must not exceed $8,383,920 and must not own “more than one property, of a vehicle less than a year old or more than one vehicleor of a vessel or aircraft”.

As reported, the registration to request the refund will take place between 16 and 23 January through the “Request refund – Decree 841/22” option on the private house portal of the AFIP website.

The scope of the bonus

The government-provided bonus reaches all private-sector workers on net wages (that is, after rebates) up to $185,000 in December, including the value of the bonus granted in that final amount.

Single-tax payers and informal economy workers are not included in the measure that the Government has regulated with a Necessity and Urgency Decree (DNU).

“This bonus does not include self-employment. There is not even informality, it is for workers who are registered in a dependent relationship”, Labor Minister Kelly Olmos specified days ago.

Furthermore, the official had explained that he had opted for a bonus and not for a fixed amount because the latter “remains for an indefinite period”, which the Executive considered “disruptive for equal negotiations”.

Source: Clarin

- Advertisement -

Related Posts