That graphic depicts the model of the universe and its reflection that came from the Big Bang.
The origin of the universe follows the idea of the Big Bang theory which suggests that 13,800 million years ago a particle produced a great explosion.
According to that idea, from the great explosion was created the matter that makes up the universe and time began to run in one direction, forward.
In 2021, Julian Barbour, a former professor at Oxford University, questioned that premise and published an article in ‘New Scientist’ magazine, in which he put the idea that the big bang is not the source of time but a midpoint at which the universe split in opposite directions. Other scientists are now proposing a new version of his hypothesis.
Julian Barbour, a former professor at Oxford University, asked about the origin of the Big Bang.
Latham Boyle, Neil Turok and Kiera Finn are experts from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada and the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manchester, UK, and since 2018 they have been awaiting approval of their ‘anti-universe’ application.
Latham Boyle, an expert at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada and at the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manchester.
Now, in the manuscript published in the journal ‘Annals of Physics’, one can read about the existence of ‘anti-universe’, a universe that existed before the Big Bang and that would explain dark matter, which does not interact with the electromagnetic field, so it is not visible, nor reflected or absorbed by materials, it is only visible by the effects of gravitational to have. .
As they suggest there will be a cosmos that will serve as our mirror before the Big Bang, where time will run in the other direction. To do this, the scientists cited the CPT Symmetry Law, which is: fee, parity and time.
According to scientists, there will be a cosmos that will work as a mirror before the Big Bang.
According to the standard model of particle physics, all particle interactions follow at least one of the symmetries, so they are considered fundamental in nature and, according to this law, they are symmetrical and the same reaction is observed if they are reversed.
In that sense, if CPT symmetry were applied to the cosmos, there would be a glass universe full of particles with conflicting charges to those in this universe. Now, the existence of this cosmos may explain dark matter. Currently, there are three types of neutrinos known, there are electronic, muonic and tau, they all rotate in the same direction: the left.
What would the anti-universe be?
Latham Boyle, one of the study’s co-authors, warns there He was not sure about the antiuniverse hypothesis and that his proposals needed to be verified experimentally.
The controversial theory has been described by reputable scientists.
But he thinks his calculations give him some clues.
“Right now, we believe the antiverse is a real mirror image visible in time, with particles and antiparticles exchanged,” Boyle told BBC World.
According to that view, that antiverse is not an independent universe, but only a reflection of our universe. “We have‘ anti-me ’in the other universe, but it’s not independent,” Boyle told the British network.
“If you choose to have eggs for breakfast, your antiverse version can’t choose bacon for breakfast.” “If you have eggs for breakfast, he’ll have anti-eggs for breakfast.”
Source: Clarin
