25 years without Lady Di: “Diana was killed twice, as a human being and erasing her from history”

On the 25th anniversary of the death of Princess Diana, the frustrated Queen of Great Britain, formerly Her Royal Highness, on the bridge of the Alma de Paris with Dodi Al Fayed, her summer adventure on the French Riviera, there is not a single official celebration in Great Britain. Neither the Royal House, nor the Conservative government, nor Princes Harry and William, her children, will publicly remember her at a church service, or on a visit to her grave in her village chapel or on Twitter. Diana, Princess of Wales, it is the first disappearance of the Royal Family, ignored by all, feared as a ghost.

As then, the royal family continues their summer holidays at Balmoral Palace, the Scottish “estate” that found Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and William and Harry, their two children, when they died at dawn in a disputed car accident on the bridge in front of the Eiffel Tower in Paris.

For the first 20 years, no one talked to their children about what happened to their mother. It was the Chief of Police, Lord Lawrence, who, in a 50 minute interview, explained to Harry and William what had happened to their mother, in a police report, undermining a £ 45 million police investigation. .

None of the royal family had spoken about the matter and the official view of the princess’s children is none other than the official story of the Scotland Yard investigation.

Prince Harry, the youngest son, was on the verge of “collapse”. His mother’s psychoanalyst saved him. He left the army and his role as a helicopter fighter pilot and married Meghan Markle, a mixed-race American.

William, the heir and older brother, has never officially spoken about the subject. His father, Prince Charles and future king, remarried his lover and the reason for their divorce, Camilla Parker Bowles, now designated queen consort.

Elizabeth II is on the verge of the end of her reign, with serious mobility problems and very few public appearances. The royal family broke off relations with Harry and Meghanwho return to Britain on 5 September to fulfill their benefit, will they go to the Palace of Balmoral or not, where they were invited by the Queen?

There is only a hideous statue of Diana in Kensington Palace and it was unveiled by her children. However, conspiracy theories about Princess Diana’s death don’t die.

Was it a fortuitous accident? Did the British establishment kill you? Was it a problem for The Firm? Who gave the order? Why didn’t the royal family come down from Balmoral to remember her on the streets of London and that indifference nearly cost the queen the crown?

To what extent does the official British investigation use British cultural precepts to shape what has happened to his public opinion, as a completely drunk Ritz hotel driver and head of security? when the French don’t drink like the British?

Why is Trevor Rees Jones, Diana’s caretaker who was rescued in the accident and lost his memory, AstraZeneca’s head of security today, under Russian siege for stealing vaccine formulas?

Devorik and the documentary

This Wednesday will air “Diane, the last truth”, a documentary made by a former British detective turned journalist, which reconstructed the incident and involved the French police who investigated. He spoke to the French police chief, who discovered that a white Fiat had touched the Mercedes Benz carrying Diana before crashing into the tunnel pillar and ruled out the role of photographers in the crash.

The Argentine Roberto Devorik, one of the princess’s living best friends and who took her on her only trip to Buenos Aires, participated in the documentary. It was to him that she Diana repeated her “premonitions” of hers so that she could “die in a car, helicopter or plane crash” and asked them not to go up with her.

From his home in Vienna, this was the dialogue with Clarionein view of the transmission of the documentary tomorrow in Great Britain, the United States and Europe.

“Good morning you can’t say. But we are facing a historic day for the 25th anniversary of the death of the English People’s Princess”, said in greeting Devorik, this traveling traveler and opera fan who came to Austria to attend. at the Salzburg Festival.

25 years have passed since the death of Princess Diana and there is not a single tribute in the English people, nor in the royal family. Because?

-I think that in the English town the celebrations are in each of them. Everyone must have it in their feelings. In the royal family it’s another story. I told the press in general: the ghost of Diana cannot be disposed of because they created it. That is to say: they are still afraid of the power that she had and of all that she has summoned, done and brought to the world, with the hope of her, with her work of love and with all that has favored the crown and the crown couldn’t look at it.

-The children are arguing. But at the same time they don’t even celebrate the death of their mother, about whom they know very little.

-I think there is a topic we don’t even know about because none of us who have been friends with Diana have called us. They made a separation. There is a very strange specter in honoring an extraordinary character like her. There is no character in the history of humanity who has tried to eliminate him even after death. Diana’s is a double death. Death as a human and immortal being: they have erased it from history, from British everyday life.

-You talked about the fear they have of Diana. Let’s talk today about the ghost, the spirit of Diana, are you afraid of the change she has involved? Are they afraid of things like what happened with Harry marrying a half-breed and leaving the monarchy? Are you afraid that today, after so many years and with the sick queen, and a royal house stuck to pins, it will fall apart?

-I do not think so. I think the queen is not sick. It is in her last days of her life for her longevity. Just what keeps the Royal Household right now is the queen, with all the strength of her that she remains of her. I think the rest of the royal family characters have proven themselves to be secondary actors.

William, the young king that is needed

-Even if they are second-rate actors, they will be the first actors when the queen disappears. Is it a solid line between Prince Charles and his son William or is it somehow a line of necessity?

-It is a line of necessity. If Prince Charles were a little less selfish and much more intelligent, he would leave the chance to his son, who at the moment is the right age to be king of Europe. It could be a character like the prime minister of Canada or the new prime ministers of the world, who are young, with energy and blood and not a man, who is 74, practically defeated by the vicissitudes of everything he has lived through and in a certain way he suffered for being such a selfish being.

Will there be another royal house after the queen or will he try to repeat history?

-No, you will not be able to repeat the history because history does not repeat itself. They might be similar. But she does not have the strength, nor the discipline, nor the greatness of the queen. The queen was wrong about Diana: she didn’t know how to handle the situation, err humanum est. But the queen was a great regent. You were an example for Great Britain. Something your child at this point is not and cannot be and will not be. Final point.

And William?

-William, we need to see how far the Buckingham Palace machinery allows him to work and how far he goes. It is not the function of a human being, but it is a whole machine.

“Will Harry come back or won’t he come back?” Will he be reconciled with his father or not?

-This doesn’t change history, because Harry is a minor royal.

-But when the father is king, he will be second in line.

No.

He will be a prince, son of the king. And what changes?

– Nothing changes because William’s son is next. Harry will never have the power of the first figure. He will always be a supporting actor.

And that was the crisis.

-The crisis wasn’t about Harry. The crisis was due to everything that Harry and his wife opened their mouths, to the irreverent behavior in front of the queen, which has never happened before. But it is not because of Prince Harry’s hierarchical and constitutional importance.

-Meghan just spoke and said they left because they had become irrelevant and annoyed others.

– That’s exactly what I’m saying. But they were irreverent towards the queen and towards the crown. The crown is an institution, like it or not. You have survived wars, economic vicissitudes, political crises. The only person who shook the crown in its years and centuries of history was the death of the Princess of Wales.

-But why? Are people suspicious? Are there any conspiracy theories?

– Let’s put aside all this and everything that has been talked about. You don’t kill a person in a car or plane crash – you can kill them alive. Her crown killed Diana in life, leaving her alone, emptying her, calling her ridiculous, telling her she had to go psychologically to a doctor, denying her public appearances of her and calling her when some world leader asked for her. The crown left it aside. The royal family put her aside and she stayed with her strength to keep going. But a person is killed while he is still alive, it is not necessary to kill him.

-25 years after his death, what would the crown have been like with Diana alive?

-If they were as negative as up to now, they would continue to fight against her. Foolishly because she would still shine. If they had been a little clever or clever, better said, she would be the traveling ambassador today who helps England to remain a world power, giving it a modernity that she does not yet have. There wouldn’t have been so many problems, both with Brexit and non-Brexit and other things if Diana had existed. Because Diana had an extraordinary vision of the future.

-You took part in a documentary that will be released tomorrow in Great Britain, what is the conclusion of that documentary?

-The conclusion is that there is no conclusion. There are reasons to think she was killed and there are reasons to say it was an accident. I have my reasons and it is that an accident happens for something and is induced, and leads to an accident.

The conclusion will be drawn from the story. I will not be alive at that time or it will never be deduced, as many things have remained a mystery. Diana, as the name “Queen of the hunters” says, has been hunted down. She was badly married to Prince Charles and thrown out by a man and that’s what makes me sad for the rest of my life.

If they hadn’t taken him out of custody when they stripped him of the title of His Royal Highness. If she had that personal custody, which it was selfish to have taken from her, they would have protected her and she would have been alive.

PB