Traveling with kids on an airplane can be an odyssey.
Although it is cheaper to fly using low -cost airlines than traditional companies, it also carries hidden costs for things like choosing luggage and seats.
A woman flying from England to Gran Canaria, Spain, – who paid 28 dollars extra to sit with her boyfriend – was questioned for refusing to replace her seat with a minor girl, fearing the plane .. Both travel on TUI Airways, a British low-cost airline.
In a post on a parent forum, the woman recounted the case that she had to settle on a flight with a low-cost company and asked who was to blame, who was wrong.
TUI airways. the British low cost company where the debate took place.
The woman explained: “Am I being unreasonable? Last week I traveled to Gran Canaria. I reserved my seat and that of my boyfriend, when we booked and we paid 28 dollars for two. I have the window and he is in the middle. “
“There was a woman sitting at the end and her daughter was in the front. She asked if they could be two in our seats, if we could swap.”
“I politely told him no, what he didn’t like. They gave us: ‘What’s the difference? You are old, my son is afraid to fly and minors, rude ‘. Anyway, we’re not moving. “
A mother and her son travel in cheap company.
He asked, “Did I make a mistake? Surely if it bothers him he can pay like we do. “
Many responded to the mother requesting a seat change, saying she had been rude in questioning. “In my opinion, you’re absolutely right! I shouldn’t have shaken either. I was just testing you,” replied one.
A second person said: “I never sat apart from my kids and never paid extra. But they’re also under 10 so I guess that’s their policy.” If his son is probably older, he should have paid. ”
Break through the networks about the couple’s position on not changing a woman’s seat.
The third intervened: “I wouldn’t have asked, but I would have changed if they had asked me.”
“It bothers me so much. I’ve lost count of how many times there have been parents on flights with small kids who don’t pay to sit together and hope that people will change.”
Another noted: “Airlines need to make it clear that they cannot guarantee that children will sit directly next to their companions. It will make this whole scenario less common. ”
Children on the plane, topic of debate in networks.
But one of them exclaimed: “I would have changed with pleasure. This thread makes me think I’m better than I thought and it says a lot.”
Some saw both sides of the argument and one commented: “She wasn’t unreasonable in asking and you weren’t unreasonable in saying no.”
And another argued: “Not irrational. Just uncharitable. Personally, I would have traded the seat for the sake of a child.”
“My partner is an adult and can survive an entire flight without me holding his hand.
“You value money more and the rights it gives you rather than the feelings of an unknown child ”.
Source: Clarin