A strike to “be able to work” and for “food security”

The protest that the camp will take place on Wednesday 13 July has particular characteristics. From the connecting table they don’t want to call it unemploymentalthough they assume they will encourage the participation of many people and suggest that no grain or livestock is being sold that day, that there is a cessation of marketing.

Beyond the semantic definition of how to manifest, agri-food is trying to give a message that transcends the complaint, a The majority of the population is “aware” in positive termsemphasizing what its production chain contributes and can add, both in food and in jobs and dollars to the economy.

they are very angry and inveigh against the situation of the country, and of agricultural production in particular, but they try not to get caught up in partisan political discussion and to be classified as part of the opposition. They try to identify with the “solution to the problems” of the country, with a collaborative vision.

However, they don’t shy away from the usual themes. What they change is the focus. They refer to the lack of dieselto Tax burden based on withholding and also from import barriers, concerning the supply of fertilizers. But they mention it warning that they are obstacles that reduce the work and productivity of the camp.

In this sense, it will not cease to be a strike in which complaint for precarious working conditions . And even if trade unionists and politicians can say they are leaders and call it a lockout, it is people who want to work better.

They also raise others government-related flags, such as food and energy security. They say they could grow in production, export, supply, bioenergy generation (more biodiesel from soybeans for diesel and ethanol from corn and sugarcane to be cut with naphtha).

Also They say they could create more jobs.with a federal development, sustainable and inclusive…