No menu items!

Brad Pitt accuses Angelina Jolie of damaging his winery’s reputation

Share This Post

- Advertisement -

Brad Pitt accuses Angelina Jolie of damaging his winery's reputation

- Advertisement -

Angelina and Brad: The couple has not stopped resuming legal conflicts since their separation.

- Advertisement -

American actor Brad Pitt denounced his former partner, actress Angelina Jolie, for deliberately damaging your company’s reputation of wines in France and sell its share to a “foreigner”, reports the local press.

The couple had acquired the Miraval vineyard in 2008 for 45 million euros (53 million dollars), with its mansion, in Provence (southeastern France), where they married years later and have enjoyed several family vacations with their six children.

Now, the plaintiff’s team leading the lawsuit open for the sale of this property accuses Jolie of intentionally harming her ex-husband. for selling your stake in the company without your consentas is clear from the documents leaked to the press.

A panorama of Chateau Miraval, in French Provence.  The vineyards are at the center of the new couple dispute.  AP photo

A panorama of Chateau Miraval, in French Provence. The vineyards are at the center of the new couple dispute. AP photo

defense of Pitt argues that Jolie not only contributed “nothing” to Miraval’s successa project that the actor was passionate about, but which he consumed the sale “secretly” and knowingly violating the conditions he had agreed with Pitt, according to which neither of them could sell their interests in that deal without the consent of the other.

The other battle: for the children

But that of wine, you know, is not the first battle between Pitt and Jolie. From the moment of their divorce, the main problem revolves around the custody of the children.

Angelina Jolie Surrounded by Her Children: The custody battle continues to face Brad Pitt.  AFP photo

Angelina Jolie Surrounded by Her Children: The custody battle continues to face Brad Pitt. AFP photo

Brad Pitt and Angelina are the parents of six children, though only five enter the dispute as Maddox, 20, is able to choose who to stay with. To put an end to the controversy and drama, it seems that the minors were ready to go against the father. Sources close to the family, in fact, have assured that, in the worst case, “they will turn against him”.

However, the intention to declare the heirs of these interpreters was rejected by the judge John Ouderkirk. However, this lawyer’s decision ended up disqualifying him from the case as Jolie said the judge did not disclose the working relationship with one of Pitt’s lawyers clearly enough, which she ended up qualifying as impartial.

And for this the sentence of shared custody between the actors was disqualifiedas announced People.

So much so that Brad Pitt is back in the fray and he petitioned the California Superior Court to review his custody agreement youth. In this request, Pitt claimed that the decision to remove the judge turned the dispute he has with his ex of him.

“All of this risks creating uncertainty for the parties, who could see big flaws like waste escrow agreements for weak interdiction reasons”, Says the actor’s statement.

Brad Pitt plays against

In turn, Pitt’s attorneys also claimed that Jolie “learned early of Judge Ouderkirk’s significant professional history with Pitt’s attorney,” but did not seek removal at the time. Even so, in any case, the California Supreme Court will have the final say, although it has not yet been clarified exactly when.

"The Simpsons" are usually a showcase of pop culture and the couple

“The Simpsons” are usually a showcase of pop culture and the couple’s conflicts between Jolie-Pitt couldn’t be left out of their satirical gaze.

However, Brad Pitt was no exception and, through his lawyer, he pointed directly to his former partner.

“The facts have not changed. There is an extraordinary body of evidence that has led the judge and the experts who testified to reach a clear conclusion on the matter what was in the best interests of the children. We will continue to do what is legally necessary based on what is best for them, ”were his words.

Source: EFE

CJL

Source: Clarin

- Advertisement -

Related Posts