Zulma Lobato has won a “damages and injury” trial and will receive a large sum of money

After a decade, Zulma Lobato won a lawsuit against TV report for “damage” after They recorded her without her consent while she was unbalanced behind the scenes.

The incident occurred in 2011 when the media I was on the show Facts and protagonists, that Anabela Ascar drove, and was about to air when he began to feel sick.

At that time, according to the file, both she and the medical staff who assisted her they asked not to be filmed. But far from it, the cameras continued and then They showed everything that happened on the air.

The arguments put forward in the document explain that the images “were not a matter of public interest, since the actor suffered an episode in which his health was compromised. ”

“All these issues belong to Mrs. D.’s private sphere, and it is not known what socially relevant interest their diffusion might have. Therefore, in the absence of consent from the plaintiff, it is clear that in the course of this transmission Mrs D’s honor, intimacy and image were hurt”, Adds the document.

The judges took into account that the actor had gone there to give an interview to that television program, but that “This was intended solely to promote their work.”

But the recording of the program “was prevented by the advent of an unfortunate episode, whose recording of the film has never been authorized; and even less the possibility of reproducing it and / or broadcasting it in public “.

At the end of the minutes it is specified that the resolution is “confirm the contested sentence in everything he decides and has been the subject of appeal and grievances, with expenses incurred by the appellant “.

Finally, the document specifies that the sum of $ 300,000 plus interest and expenses must be paid to the plaintiff.

Another case of damage

Prior to this case, Zulma Lobato had gone through a similar situation in 2007 when the TV show Chiche Gelblung has published a report that damages her image.

The events occurred in the cycle 70-20-10led by Chiche, in which Lobato was ridiculed to the level of insinuating this I was looking for food in the garbage.

The report stated that in front of Zulma’s house there was a supermarket where they sometimes throw the garbage and she checked it. And that when asked by the reporter if he had actually eaten from the garbage, an interviewee quoted for the article replied in the affirmative.

On that occasion, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation rejected the appeal of the production company and confirmed the sentence of the Civil Chamber, which ordered a compensation of 200,000 pesos in favor of the media.

DD