No menu items!

River won in Chile but in Colo Colo there was anger in arbitration: “Can’t understand without VAR”

Share This Post

- Advertisement -

River won in Chile but in Colo Colo there was anger over the arbitration:

The play of controversy, in River’s 1-0 preview. Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI / AFP.

- Advertisement -

After “we passed it in the ass” of Marcelo Gallardo after a 1-1 draw against Atletico Tucuman for the Professional League Cup, river I need a match like this. El Millonario need to overcome, show the necessary character in a very cool match in Chile and bring a victory against colo colo to continue as Group F’s leader Libertadores Cup Y with perfect marks.

- Advertisement -

So it is. Perhaps there was no football pomp, but with extreme intensity, River celebrated a 2-1 fight win, in a match that didn’t avoid controversy. It was that in the past of the group’s first goal under the direction of Marcelo Gallardo, a clear violation of Paulo Díaz with Oroz in the middle of the recovery court could change the history of the fight.

But the referee didn’t see it, he let it go on and, without a VAR, Millo went 1-0 after Herrera’s overflow, Carabalí’s rebound and Matías Suárez’s goal. After the match, Gustavo QuinterosColo Colo’s Argentine coach pointed out the controversial move and directed against the referee and the absence of the VAR in the first round of the Copa Libertadores.

“It was a pretty fair game, there was no noticeable difference in football for one or the other. The details were what made the difference. Which one was it? A massive referee mistake, which wasn’t just a foul in favor of Colo Colo. From there, they took full advantage of the opportunity and scored a goal, which was also our mistake, because we couldn’t deny it. That detail makes the difference. “

The coach also said this unpaid violation could be the second yellow card for Díaz, leaving River with a low count. However, according to the referee’s sheet, Díaz had not been notified before.

Who can go to the shower early is milton’s helmetthat 18 minutes into the first half Argentine Pablo Solari was elbowed and the referee of the match deemed it not a very serious foul and only gave him a yellow card.

Quinteros added: “Because then we scored valid goals, one for each side, and I think a tie is the sweetest. I think we played well and I am satisfied with the team’s performance “.

In addition, re -consulting the breach, he specified the need to incorporate the technology: “It’s incomprehensible that there is no VAR, I don’t understand it. The goal has been annulled. Unfortunately, now it is against us, I’ll wait and see if it’s our time in the next games. “

Regarding Colo Colo’s future in the group, where he is second three points behind River, he said: “Every game will be like this. We faced one of the candidates and we played a good game. This way, we can fight for a classification. Beyond the bad result, I always save the positive, which is so much. Now, the only negative is the result. In the game I am very satisfied “.

On the other hand, he reviewed the game and praised River’s work: “I think we had a lot of opponents and were very good throughout the game. We analyzed and evaluated everything River showed. It’s a team that performs well and builds situations very easily. ”

More quotes from Quinteros

I don’t see much difference in favor of the River, In the first half I think more came. This is for any of them. They did the job well. “

“When we go out to play, we always look for the three points. We will try in Peru and Argentina, we can think of nothing else. We always come out and win games and it’s important that it’s that way. ”

“The main goal of the season is the national tournament. We have to go in search of the championship, which escaped us due to external situations, let’s say ”.

Source: Clarin

- Advertisement -

Related Posts