Daniel Alves case: What happens if he is convicted?

The soccer player Daniel Alves is being tried at the Barcelona Court, in Spain, on charges of having committed sexual assault against a woman in the bathroom of a nightclub in December 2022. The trial is expected to come to an end this Wednesday, 7th, and justice will be handed down. the sentence for him. What happens if he is convicted?

The trial may come to an end this Wednesday, but that does not mean that the sentence will already be announced. The Court does not have a set deadline for announcing his sentence. As a result, the athlete will remain in preventive detention until the sentence is defined. It is worth noting that the accusation asks that he receive a sentence of 12 years in prison, which is the maximum for this type of accusation. Meanwhile, the Public Prosecutor’s Office is asking for a sentence of 9 years in prison.

Despite this, the court can still give a sentence of 6 years in prison because he has already paid compensation of 150 thousand euros to the woman who made the accusation. Another point is that Daniel may still have to serve another 10 years of supervised release after serving the detention period.

If Daniel Alves is found guilty, he will remain in prison, but may appeal. If he is found innocent, he can be released and the prosecution can appeal.

The forecast is that Daniel Alves will give his testimony this Wednesday, 7th, and bring a new version of what happened that night.

++ Daniel Alves Case: Find out what his wife said in her statement

Daniel Alves’ versions

Over the year he was imprisoned in Spain, Daniel Alves has already presented four versions of what happened that night at the nightclub. In his first version, he said that he did not have sexual relations with the woman who accuses him and said that he did not know her. In the second version, he stated that he was in the bathroom when the woman entered, but had no contact with her.

In the third version, after being arrested, Daniel Alves stated that the sexual relationship was consensual and that they had oral sex. In the fourth version, he said that the relationship was consensual and had penetration. Now, his defense must present a fifth version, in which he will say that he was drunk and was not fully aware of what he did.