The controversial match finale in which Boca beat the leader, Atlético Tucumán, 2-1, added a new chapter to the big argument that the cross in which defender Xeneize Carlos Zambrano nudged the defender was a penalty. or less. Master Puch. So much has been said about the comedy with which the controversy has reached politics Maurizio Macri as the protagonist.
The former president attended a lunch with the representatives of the PRO, which was held at the Happening restaurant on Costanera Norte and added the analysis. Both when he arrived and when he left his post, he was approached by journalists who asked him questions about the situation in the country. The engineer answered hardly anyone, but took a moment to deliver his verdict on one tied to the club he has been able to preside over for more than two decades.
“Mauricio, was he the criminal from Zambrano?“Asked one of the reporters who followed the event. The answer left no doubt:”For me it was criminal“.
Last Sunday’s show at the Bombonera continues to generate controversy. Several of Dean’s players have shown their anger at considering they have been harmed. The reality is that neither referee Fernando Espinoza nor the VAR understood that it was a penalty.
Even after the match, with the eloquence of the visuals and replays, Espinoza insisted that his decision was the right one. “We interpret the same with the VAR. After seeing the play I am still convinced. If we take the picture it is red and arrested. But you have to see the general movement and there is no penalty“, assured the judge talking with TyC Sports.
Espinoza was very convinced: “Zambrano’s was just a leaning arm. I’m convinced. We talked to the VAR. The VAR called if there was a clear and manifest error, and they didn’t see it. Then we saw it again and it’s not criminal“.
DB
Source: Clarin
