What position did Boca take before the opportunity for Rafa Di Zeo and Mauro Martín to enter Superclásico vs River

Generated a resolution of Justice, a few days before the Superclásico national controversy and internal uproar at Boca. From the decision of Edgardo Walter Lara CorreaHead of the National Court of First Instance in Federal Administrative Litigation No. 10, Rafa Di Zeo, Mauro Martin -leader of La Doce- e three more bars will be able to attend the Bombonera next Sunday. Despite, of course, the Admission rights that weighs on them. And in this case, there doesn’t seem to be any crack. The Ministry of Security of the Nation has challenged the decision, but the final sentence could be postponed, a power that the judge has and which could take up to three months.

The question, therefore, is to know what position will the leadership of xeneize takewhich established a ranking of members that limits access to those who have declared to be present, at least, in six of the nine games that the team of Hugo Ibarra played in the current Professional League.

Taking into account that active members and fans who have not been to the stadium half a dozen times will not be able to enter to watch the match with River, Di Zeo and Martín, plus Sebastián Skeletor Maciel, Eduardo Animal Trípodi and Antonio Vinales, they would have to suffer the same fate. Regardless, of course, of Lara Correa’s decision. consulted by Clarionea senior manager said: “We will leave everything in the hands of Justice, if they say they must enter it is beyond our responsibility”.

Is that no one expected the judge, he had the order at the entrance table from June, will take this determination now. For the authorities of the City of Buenos Aires and the Nation, “It seemed on purpose”. Now, for what purpose? According to the Lara Correa foundation “only judges can decree the prohibition of competition based on law 23.184, which allows this provision with a maximum of five years if a trial is pending or alive if there is a conviction in an extreme case severity”.

The portfolio in charge of Hannibal Fernandez he argued that it is the state that reserves its power, through the police, to prevent the entry of violent people into the stadiums, based on their past or their ongoing trials. In the case of bars, they await a trial in which they are accused coverage of a kidnapping for ransom purposeslawsuit that will be resolved in the Federal Supreme Court n. 8. Di Zeo also adds a judgment in that alleged instigator of double homicide inside La Doce, a situation that occurred before the friendly match against San Lorenzo at the Nuovo Gasometro in July 2013, a trial that will take place from Tuesday at the Oral Criminal Court n. 13.

According to Lara Correa, «always within the limited cognitive framework typical of every precautionary measure, it should be noted that the regulatory review carried out shows that the competent criminal courts have the power to establish ‘competition bans’ for sporting events. and, on the other hand, the National Executive Power has the power to temporarily or permanently close the stadiums “.

However, since the application of decree 246/17 which came into force during the government of Mauricio Macri, the National Executive Power has the power to “prohibit administrative competition” and for this reason the National Security Directorate has been in charge of sports shows. Since 2019 it has been legislated at the Supreme Court of Justice. Yes, despite the darts that exist between the ruling party and the government-level opposition, at this juncture everyone agrees..

“I went beyond the amparo remedy, I presented the unconstitutionality of the Secure Tribune because it violates the legitimacy of the people. I understand that someone can decide on the person being prosecuted who is a judge, not someone or something created to interfere in people’s lives. Rafa Di Zeo and Mauro Martín have no legal impediment to enter the court, ”she said. Diego Storolawyer of the forum.

In this sense, as explained by the Ministry of Security of the Nation to the Clarione, if the appeal had been in criminal jurisdiction, it would have had immediate suspensive effect. In presenting the amaro in the litigation-administrative area, Lara Correa may require more time.

The judge highlighted in January and July last year for two failures that made noise. At the beginning of 2021 it rejected a protection action by a taxpayer, who refused to pay the “Solidarity and Extraordinary Contribution”. He later rejected Telecom’s request, which asked for the suspension of the decree declaring essential services for the provision of internet, cable television and mobile telephony.

“If this is successful, they will put an end to the only real and precise public policy to prevent the spread of bars in football,” he complained. William Maderoexecutive director of the Buenos Aires Football Safety Committee, in dialogue with Clarione.

The scenario dangerously opens the indoor door for other bars with admission rights.