No menu items!

In 1960, a Nobel laureate put forward a theory that has now been confirmed in Antarctica.

Share This Post

- Advertisement -

A 60-year-old physical theory has been demonstrated thanks to a detector of particles that come from space and contain a large amount of energy. The device, installed under the ice of the South Pole, demonstrated the phenomenon anticipated by Nobel Prize winner Sheldon Glashow in 1960.

- Advertisement -

A detector of high-energy particles from space located under the ice of the South Pole, experimentally tested a 60-year-old physical theory.

On December 6, 2016, a The electron antineutrino rushed to Earth from space at nearly the speed of light carrying 6.3 petaelectron volts (PeV) of energy. Deep in the South Pole ice sheet, it slammed into an electron and produced a particle that rapidly decayed into a shower of secondary particles. The interaction was captured by a huge telescope buried in the Antarctic glacier, the IceCube neutrino observatory.

- Advertisement -

IceCube had witnessed a Glashow resonance event, a phenomenon predicted by the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sheldon Glashow in 1960. With this detection, scientists provided yet another confirmation of the Standard Model of particle physics. It also further demonstrated the ability of IceCube, which detects nearly massless particles called neutrinos using thousands of sensors embedded in Antarctic ice, to perform fundamental physics. The result was published months ago in the magazine Nature.

Sheldon Glashow first proposed this resonance in 1960 when he was a postdoctoral researcher at what is now the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. There, he wrote a paper in which he predicted that an antineutrino (the antimatter twin of a neutrino) could interact with an electron to produce a particle not yet discoveredif the antineutrino had the right energy, through a process known as resonance.

When the proposed particle, the W boson, was finally discovered in 1983, turned out to be much heavier than Glashow and his colleagues predicted in 1960. Glashow’s resonance would require a neutrino with an energy of 6.3 PeV, nearly 1,000 times more energetic than is capable. Hadron collider at CERN. Indeed, no man-made particle accelerator on Earth, current or planned, could create a neutrino with that much energy.

But what about a natural accelerator in space? the huge black hole energies Supermassives at the center of galaxies and other extreme cosmic events can generate particles with energies impossible to create on Earth. Such a phenomenon was likely responsible for the 6.3 PeV antineutrino reaching the IceCube in 2016.

“When Glashow was a postdoc at Niels Bohr, he could never have imagined that his unconventional proposal to produce the W boson would be accomplished by an antineutrino from a distant galaxy hitting the ice of Antarctica,” he says in a statement. . Francis Halzenprofessor of physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, headquarters of IceCube maintenance and operations, and Principal Investigator for IceCube.

Since IceCube became fully operational in May 2011, the observatory has detected hundreds of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos and has produced a number of significant results in particle astrophysics, including the discovery of a flux of astrophysical neutrinos in 2013 and the first identification of an astrophysical neutrino source in 2018. But the Glashow resonance event is particularly notable because of its remarkably high energy; it is only the third event detected by the IceCube with an energy higher than 5 PeV.

“This result demonstrates the feasibility of neutrino astronomy and IceCube’s ability to do so, which will play an important role in future multi-messenger astroparticle physics,” he says. Christian Haac, a graduate student at RWTH Aachen while working on this analysis. “We can now detect single neutrino events that are unequivocally extraterrestrial in origin.”

The result also opens a new chapter in neutrino astronomy as it begins to untangle neutrinos from antineutrinos. “Previous measurements were not sensitive to the difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos, so this result is the first direct measurement of an antineutrino component of the astrophysical neutrino flux,” he says. Lu Lu, one of the lead reviewers of this article, who was a postdoc at Chiba University in Japan during the review.

Source: Clarin

- Advertisement -

Related Posts