No menu items!

To void her marriage contract, she took an imposter to wife – the least expected ending

Share This Post

- Advertisement -

Once the love is over, it is often difficult for either party to walk away from the other person. Release, let go. And the case of a marriage everything becomes more complex. As in the case of the man who they wanted to cancel their previous deal.

- Advertisement -

Love and cards don’t always run on the same tracks and both parties must be in agreement when signing this one separation agreement.

- Advertisement -

Agreement and separation after two decades

Warren and Gina Zant They got married in 1999 and after two decades of living together they separated.

After two decades the marriage ended but there was an agreement.  Illustrative photo.

After two decades the marriage ended but there was an agreement. Illustrative photo.

It was then that they filed a separation agreement which stipulated that the woman would have received the survivor’s benefit of your ex-husband’s Operations Engineers Pension Plan.

But over the years, the man has brought before the judge a strange case in which He applied for an annulment of his old marriage.

To do so, he relied precisely on the testimony of his ex-wife, who claimed to have been fully aware that their marriage had not been legally bindingspreads 20 minutes.

The judge intervened on the matter, approved the petition, but there was something in the case that did not fit the reality.

And it was no small detail: Warren Zant had used it a woman who wasn’t Gina to impersonate her and sign this agreement.

Under the settlement, the woman would receive survivor's benefits from her husband's Operations Engineers Retirement Plan.

Under the settlement, the woman would receive survivor’s benefits from her husband’s Operations Engineers Retirement Plan.

Fraud and judge’s decision

The real Gina found out about the situation and contacted the specialists handling the case to declare it I had never been involved in this petition.

So the judge investigated the documents presented and discovered dubious data supporting Warren Zant’s original annulment request.

Some examples were fake commissioners and notariesand of course the most impressive, the imposter who performed the function of being the ex-wife.

“I cannot determine, based on the evidence before me, who actually appeared on the application representing herself as Gina Elizabeth Zant,” she ruled.

The judge confirmed that whoever was present had been an imposter.

The judge confirmed that whoever was present had been an imposter.

“However, I am convinced that anyone who witnessed by telephone on that date was an imposter,” the judge wrote in his decision. cancel marriage annulment which he had approved almost a year ago.

Following the incident that went viral, it is unknown whether Warren Zant and the person who impersonated his ex-wife will face any legal consequences. For now, Gina Zant’s lawyer says so a fine would be the bare minimum.

Source: Clarin

- Advertisement -

Related Posts