Her husband forbade her to see their children because of her diaper fetish

It is common to hear cases where, after divorce, one of the parents does not let one see the children of couples or spend time with them. In general, these are complex situations in which Justice must participate to intervene and try to reach a solution.

But this case, unlike the usual ones, is not as dramatically bizarre. It is that a father is forbidden to see his children because of him diaper fetish.

Enraged, the man – who for legal reasons cannot be determined – insists he has discrimination against her lifestyle and plans to take her against the Superior Courts.

The controversy: who is right?

The couple met in the mid-2000s in Australia. At that time, he was already there trick of wearing a diaper. When the children were born, they both agreed that he would take his amulet away from the little children so that does not affect their growth.

Although her ex -husband was aware of this habit, he made sure it intensified up to that point wore strange garments at home, without any embarrassmentreported The mirror.

As the children grew older, the woman worried that it might be her father’s habit negatively affecting them. And the man, stubborn, systematically refused to see a psychologist or a family counselor to resolve this issue.

This was so that the couple decided to separate but, at that time, they consented continue sharing parenting.

But serious problems didn’t come until 2019, when the woman sued the local court at one point the man went to find his children at home with the diaper exposed.

That’s what decided the mother of the little ones denounced the situation and carried out legal actions.

The case progressed to Justice and, in 2021, she is legally forbidden to see her children. The man appealed the proposal but it was reaffirmed by Justice on April 13.

This prompted the children’s father to say he would pursue his case on High courtannounced by the British media.

“This man have not satisfactorily addressed issues that pose a risk to their childrenSaid Hilary Hannan, a local Family Court judge.

He added: “I have extreme reservations and ultimately do not believe that the father has the real willingness or ability to refuse to engage in the behaviors in question and his connections to the community.”

father’s words

In an email sent to The Daily Telegraphthe man criticized Judge Hannam saying his decision was “horrible and unfair” and She denies that her children were exposed to her amulet.

Then the man said he felt like he was there is discrimination because of its association with the community “Adult Baby Diaper Lovers“(“Adults Who Love Baby Diapers”in Spanish).

“I feel and have always respected other minority identities being persecuted or treated differently just because of who they are. What I chose to do in the privacy of my own home with no children present was my business. It is a harmless activity and does not affect anyone“, detailed in the text.

Despite this, in Judge Hannan’s decision, he believed it was inevitable that they would be exposed to behavior that was likely to cause them psychological harm.

Furthermore, he added that children will be laughed at if their connection to the community is discovered and exposed.

For her part, the ex -husband’s lawyer has indicated that Judge Hannan’s decision represents a historic decisionend The mirror.