Former US President Donald Trump posted a message called “Truth” on his social network Wednesday (10), suggesting that US federal police may have “planted evidence” against him after the house was demolished at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. searched by the police last Monday (8).
Former US President Donald Trump posted a message called “Truth” on his social network Wednesday (10), suggesting that US federal police may have “planted evidence” against him after the house was demolished at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. searched by the police last Monday (8).
There is no evidence to support his claims, but Donald Trump is based on the fact that no one, not even his lawyers, will be allowed to be present during the police search. However, the absence of witnesses during an FBI intervention is the norm against American experts.
The theory that the FBI may have had classified evidence against Donald Trump while searching the former president’s home came from an anonymous right-wing Twitter account. The broadcast, which started to circulate on social media on Monday night, gained dimension in a short time after Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba made a statement on the television channel. Fox News: “I’m worried they might be hiding something. Who knows? I don’t trust the government and that’s scary for an American! These are third world jobs from Cuba! Our country is not like that.”
This Wednesday, Fox News, which has seemed to have turned its back on Donald Trump for a while, continued to run interviews on the subject, with Republicans like Senator Rand Paul in attendance: “How can I be sure they didn’t? Did they put something in the boxes they brought from Mar-a-Lago? They lost our trust”.
Republican Greg Steube, member of the House Judiciary Committee, even denounces the “Joe Biden police state at war with the Conservatives.” Ron Filipkowski, a former federal prosecutor, said on Twitter: “Nothing can confirm Trump’s guilt more than the implication that the FBI planted false evidence. He’s been caught and he knows it.”
war of narratives
However, US Attorney General Merrick Garland has yet to respond to these allegations. It’s worth remembering that since the Watergate scandal, the Department of Justice has made no mention of ongoing investigations, says Jean Eric Branaa, an expert on American politics at the University of Paris II.
According to him, doubt really only exists about Donald Trump’s behavior. “A search warrant always contains both the reason for the search and what is being searched. If Donald Trump had issued the warrant, everyone would know why it was processed and what was being searched,” he explains.
The former president, too, prefers to fill the silence left by the attorney general. A critical silence, even within the Ministry, makes Merrick Garland’s position almost untenable.
“Either he speaks now and declares that he blames Donald Trump, or he immediately blames him and the case is settled. But if he does this before the election, it would be a political act that could change the course of the election.” [de meio de mandato] one way or another, but it’s going to ruin the vote anyway, and that’s a real problem. If he does not speak up, it will be Trump who will come forward with his own story, his own narrative,” adds Jean Eric Branaa.
The truth is, the Republican fear of taking over the Senate with the November midterm elections makes this “balancing move” all the more dangerous for Merrick Garland, who insisted a few months ago: “We have to express ourselves through our work.”
source: Noticias
[author_name]
